Pages

Subscribe:

Just an ordinary blog written by an ordinary person.

Please take a little of your time and enjoy reading this blog

Senin, 29 September 2014

English Essay Task
Elwanda Yudistira
1415061014

 Enviromental Impact of The Energy Industry

The environmental impact of the energy industry is diverse. Energy has been harnessed by human beings for millennia. Initially it was with the use of fire for light, heat, cooking and for safety, and its use can be traced back at least 1.9 million years. In recent years there has been a trend towards the increased commercialization of various renewable energy sources.
Consumption of fossil fuel resources leads to global warming and climate change. In most parts of the world little change is being made to slow these changes. If the peak oil theory proves true, and more explorations of viable alternative energy sources are made, our impact could be less hostile to our environment.
Rapidly advancing technologies can achieve a transition of energy generation, water and waste management, and food production towards better environmental and energy usage practices using methods of systems ecology and industrial ecology.

Climate Change
The scientific consensus on global warming and climate change is that it is caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, the majority of which comes from burning fossil fuels with deforestation and some agricultural practices being also major contributors.
Although there is a highly publicized denial of climate change, the vast majority of scientists working in climatology accept that it is due to human activity. The IPCC report Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability predicts that climate change will cause shortages of food and water and increased risk of flooding that will affect billions of people, particularly those living in poverty.
One measurement of greenhouse gas related and other Externality comparisons between energy sources can be found in the ExternE project by the Paul Scherrer Institut and the University of Stuttgart which was funded by the European Commission. According to that study, hydroelectric electricity produces the lowest CO2 emissions, wind produces the second-lowest, nuclear energy produces the third-lowest and solar photovoltaic produces the fourth-lowest.
Similarly, the same research study (ExternE, Externalities of Energy), undertaken from 1995 to 2005 found that the cost of producing electricity from coal or oil would double over its present value, and the cost of electricity production from gas would increase by 30% if external costs such as damage to the environment and to human health, from the airborne particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, chromium VI and arsenic emissions produced by these sources, were taken into account. It was estimated in the study that these external, downstream, fossil fuel costs amount up to 1%-2% of the EU’s entire Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and this was before the external cost of global warming from these sources was even included.
The study also found that the environmental and health costs of nuclear power, per unit of energy delivered, was €0.0019/kWh, which was found to be lower than that of many renewable sources including that caused by biomass and photovoltaic solar panels, and was thirty times lower than coal at €0.06/kWh, or 6 cents/kWh, with the energy sources of the lowest external environmental and health costs associated with it being wind power at €0.0009/kWh.

Biofuels: Biomass, Ethanol and Biodiesel

On the surface, biofuels look like an ideal energy solution. Since plants absorb carbon dioxide as they grow, crops could counteract the carbon dioxide released by cars. They are also renewable, and can be planted to replenish supplies.
Unfortunately, it’s not that easy. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to grow crops, make fertilizers and pesticides and process plants into fuel. There is ongoing debate if ethanol from corn provides more energy than it uses for growing and processing the plants. Also, fossil fuels provide much of the energy in biofuels production, so biofuels may not replace as much oil as they use.
Biomass creates harmful emissions like carbon dioxide and sulfur when it is burned, but causes less pollution than fossil fuels. Even burning wood in a fireplace or stove can create pollutants like carbon monoxide. Burning municipal solid waste, or garbage that would otherwise go into a landfill, can also cause potentially dangerous emissions. Combustion of these materials must be carefully controlled. Disposing of the resulting ash can also pose a problem, as it may contain harmful metals like lead and cadmium.
Ethanol is often added to gasoline, and while these mixtures burn cleaner than pure gasoline, they also have higher “evaporative emissions” from dispensing equipment and fuel tanks. These emissions contribute to ozone problems and smog. Burning ethanol also creates carbon dioxide.
Biodiesel creates less sulfur oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons when burned that traditional petroleum diesel. But biodiesel creates more nitrogen oxide than petroleum diesel.

Coal
Coal mining has the potential to harm air, water and land quality if it is not done with proper care. Acidic water may drain from abandoned mines underground, and the burning of coal causes the emission of harmful materials including carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and mercury. “Clean coal” technology is being developed to remove harmful materials before they can affect the environment, and to make it more energy-efficient so less coal is burned.
The coal industry also restores mined land to or prepares it for more productive uses once surface mining is done.

Geothermal
Geothermal power plants have relatively little environmental impact—they burn no fuel to create electricity. These plants do create small amounts of carbon dioxide and sulfur compounds, but geothermal emissions are far smaller than those created by fossil fuel power plants.


Hydropower

While hydropower does not cause water or air pollution, it does have an environmental impact: Hydroelectric power plants may harm fish populations, change water temperature and flow (disturbing plants and animals) and force the relocation of people and animals who live near the dam site. Some fish, like salmon, may be prevented from swimming upstream to spawn. Technologies like fish ladders help salmon go up over dams and enter upstream spawning areas, but the presence of hydroelectric dams changes their migration patterns and hurts fish populations. Hydropower plants can also cause low dissolved oxygen levels in the water, which is harmful to river habitats. Reservoirs may also lead to the creation of methane, a harmful greenhouse gas.


Petroleum (Oil and Gas)

Great strides have been made to ensure that oil and gas producers make as little impact as possible on the natural environments in which they operate. These include drilling multiple wells from a single location to minimize damages to the surface, using environmentally sound chemicals to stimulate well production and restoring the surface as nearly as possible to pre-drilling conditions (as required by landowners and state or federal agencies, who often must approve the company’s completion of restoration activities).
When many people think of oil and the environment, they think of oil spills. The reality is that the exploration and production of oil rarely create an oil spill. For decades the offshore oil and gas industry has had a strong safety and environmental record in operating in the Gulf of Mexico, with less than 0.001 percent of the oil produced in federal waters spilled since 1980. The Deepwater Horizon event is a stark reminder of the risks and challenges in offshore operations. The oil and gas industry takes safety and environmental stewardship very seriously. That is why when it is known how the Deepwater Horizon accident occurred, the industry will work together to ensure that that this kind of event never happens again anywhere in the world.
Most oil spills occur primarily during transportation, mostly involving the tankers that are used to move oil from where it is produced to where consumers need it. But oil spills from transportation have declined significantly during the past few years, and the growing use of double-hulled tankers provides extra protection. Another source of oil spills during transportation is pipelines. Unfortunately, a major reason for spills from pipelines in developing countries is civil unrest. Weather, such as hurricanes, is another factor in pipeline-related spills.
Urban runoff and natural seeps are large sources of oil pollution. Urban runoff comes from rain washing away oil drips from cars or machinery and people pouring used oil into the gutter and using other improper disposal methods. Natural seepage is actually the largest single source of petroleum inputs in marine environments totaling 47%.
When burned, petroleum products emit carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and other air toxins, all of which have a negative effect on the environment.


Solar

Solar energy produces no air or water pollution or greenhouse gases. However, it has some indirect impacts on the environment. For example, the manufacturing of photovoltaic cells (PV) produces some toxic materials and chemicals.
Ecosystems can also be affected by solar systems. Water from underground wells may be required to clean concentrators and receivers, and to cool the generator, which may harm the ecosystem in dry climates.


Uranium (Nuclear Energy)

Nuclear power plants produce no air pollution or carbon dioxide, but they do produce byproducts like nuclear waste and spent fuels. Most nuclear waste is low level (for example, disposable items that have come into contact with small amounts of radioactive dust), and special regulations are in place to prevent them from harming the environment. But some spent fuel is highly radioactive and must be stored in specially designed facilities. In addition to the fuel waste, much of the equipment in the nuclear power plants becomes contaminated with radiation and will become radioactive waste after the plant is closed. These wastes will remain radioactive for many thousands of years, which may not allow re-use of the contaminated land.
Nuclear power plants use large quantities of water for steam production and for cooling, affecting fish and other aquatic life. Likewise, heavy metals and salts can build up in the water used in the nuclear power plant systems. When water is discharged from the power plant, these pollutants can negatively affect water quality and aquatic life.


Wind

Wind is a clean energy source. It produces no air or water pollution because no fuel is burned to generate electricity. The most serious environmental impact from wind energy may be its effect on bird and bat mortality. Wind turbine design has changed dramatically in the last couple of decades to reduce this impact. Turbine blades are now solid, so there are no lattice structures that entice birds to perch. Also, the blades’ surface area is much larger, so they don’t have to spin as fast to generate power. Slower-moving blades mean fewer bird collisions.
So, although there are many drawbacks from of energy industry, scientist has try their best to make a better change in the last couple of decades. And we know that energy industry has been an important thing in our life, so we should use it efficiently and i hope we can find a way to reduce or even remove the harmness of energy industry in the future.

References


0 komentar:

Posting Komentar